Recovery center would be asset
This is in response to the story about opposition to the Genesis Recovery Center that Pathways is planning.
To everyone who agrees that Ashland needs a place like this, but says they do not want it in their neighborhood, I ask the question: “If not yours, whose?”
Also if you do not think that there are already addicts living in your neighborhoods, I bet you would be surprised. These addicts are not interested in getting better; they are only interested in getting their next pill.
I can almost guarantee that every single person in Ashland knows someone whose family has someone with a drug problem; they may not admit someone has a drug problem or the family may not be aware of the problem, but it’s that bad these days.
I worked as an addictions counselor for two years, and the first thing I learned was addiction affects people from all walks of life: rich, poor, educated, young, old, healthy and disabled.
The clinic that Pathways is planning will not accept just anyone off the streets either. It will have specific criteria like you cannot have a propensity to violence, have been charged with a sexual crime, etc. Personally, I would rather have a recovery center in my neighborhood than some of the drug houses we currently have in Ashland. At least the people in the recovery center are recovering and want to make a positive change.
Jennifer Nichols, Ashland
Writer misses ‘old’Pathways
Once it was important to Pathways to promote the health and well-being of citizens and communities. Pathways endeavored to treat all community members with respect and dignity and to maintain the public’s trust and confidence in the services provided.
Pathways recent treatment of the Cedar Knoll community strongly suggests that these goals and core values are no longer important.
I miss the “old” Pathways.
M.S. Sampson, Ashland